The salary of college graduates is worse than that of migrant workers or social progress-3u8895

The wage of graduates as migrant workers or migrant workers salary and the performance of social progress [Abstract] with the university graduates, in the background of our country is very strong, because a lot of people read the purpose of university is to get a good job, get a higher salary… According to the Ministry of human resources and social data, migrant workers in 2015 the average monthly income of 3072 yuan over the past 10 years, the average monthly income of migrant workers increased by 251%. Correspondingly, the average monthly income of the 2015 college graduates is 3726 yuan after half a year. The income advantage of college graduates to migrant workers has shrunk to about 1.2 times from about 1.8 times at the end of 2005. (the "twenty-first Century economic report" in September 19th) and migrant workers get salary of university graduates, in the realistic background our country is very strong, because a lot of people read the purpose of university is to get a good job, get a higher salary. If the University’s economic returns go down, and the salary after graduation is even worse than that of the migrant workers, the attraction of the university will be greatly weakened. In some Midwestern and rural poor areas, there has been a new phenomenon of "useless reading", because of the decline in the economic returns to universities. However, the gap between the salary of migrant workers and the salary gap of university graduates is the trend of the times, and it is the inevitable result of social progress and labor remuneration improvement. In the developed countries of Europe and America, the social status of workers is fully guaranteed, because the workers enjoy welfare and wages are not low. This provides individuals with more diverse jobs, and people don’t have to focus on a few "glamorous" jobs or jobs. Only go to college to become the social concept is expected to change, the students in junior high school after graduation, you can choose the vocational school, after graduating from high school can not directly participate in the college entrance examination employment. Of course, migrant workers need to master modern skills in order to obtain their own professional development and be recognized in their posts. To study in University, to be a worker, to study. There is no difference between accepting vocational education and learning academic courses in university. In the university economic return is reduced, students and parents can not fall into thinking that since college graduates and migrant workers pay almost, then don’t go to college; since college, not high school (including occupation high school), than to go to work early. So to give up his studies to "work" migrant workers, due to the lack of proficiency in a particular line can only do simple manual work. However, in order to adapt to the development of the times, migrant workers also need to continue charging, including receiving vocational training and continuing education. Higher education must also seriously think about what is available to the educated For a long time, the most important reward for higher education in China is a diploma. With a diploma, graduates can find good jobs. And now, the diploma is more and more "worthless", if the continuation of the current mode of College Students’ identity, don’t say will not worth the money, even the education itself will fall into crisis. Colleges and universities should give the educated students a genuine education, so that the educated feel that this experience is worthwhile. The return of higher education to the educated includes utilitarian values and non utilitarian values. Utilitarian value is mainly through learning knowledge and skills.

大学毕业生工资不如农民工或是社会进步的表现 [摘要]拿大学毕业生的薪酬与农民工比较,在我国有很强的现实背景,因为很多人读大学的目的就是为了获得一份“好工作”,得到更高的薪酬…根据人社部的数据,2015年农民工月均收入为3072元,过去10年农民工的月均收入增长了251%。与之对应,2015届大学毕业生半年后平均月收入为3726元。大学毕业生对农民工的收入优势,已从2005年年底的约1.8倍缩小到约1.2倍。(《21世纪经济报道》9月19日)拿大学毕业生的薪酬与农民工比较,在我国有很强的现实背景,因为很多人读大学的目的就是为了获得一份“好工作”,得到更高的薪酬。如果上大学的经济回报下降,毕业后的薪酬甚至不如农民工,那上大学的吸引力会大大减弱。在一些中西部和农村贫困地区,确实发生了因上大学的经济回报下降,而出现了新的“读书无用论”现象。然而,农民工薪酬与大学毕业生薪酬差距缩小是大势所趋,是社会进步、劳动力报酬提高的必然。在欧美发达国家,工人的社会地位有充分保障,那是因为工人享有的福利保障和工资并不低。这为个体提供了更多元的就业选择,人们不必只盯着少数“光鲜”的行业与岗位。只有上大学才能成才的社会观念也有望改变,学生在初中毕业后,可以选择中职校,高中毕业后可以不参加高考直接就业。当然,农民工要获得自身的职业发展,在岗位上得到认可,同样需要掌握现代技能。上大学要学习,做工人也要学习。接受职业教育与上大学学习学术课程,也没有高低之分。在上大学的经济回报降低时,学生和家长不能陷入这样的思维误区:既然大学毕业生的薪酬与农民工差不多,那就不要上大学;既然不上大学,就不 读高中(包括职业高中),还不如早早去打工。这样放弃学业去“打工”的农民工,由于没有一技之长,只能做简单的体力活。但是,为适应时代的发展,农民工也 需要持续充电,包括接受职业培训和继续教育。高等教育也必须认真思考究竟给受教育者提供了什么?长期以来,我国高等教育给受教育者最重要的回报物是一纸文凭,凭借一纸文凭,毕业生就能 找到不错的工作。而现在,文凭越来越“不值钱”了,如果高等学校延续当前的办学模式,不要说大学生身份会不值钱,就连教育本身也会陷入危机。高等学校要给 受教育者货真价实的教育,让受教育者觉得这段求学经历是值得的。高等学校给受教育者的回报,包括功利的价值与非功利的价值。功利的价值,主要是通过学习知识和技能,提高就业竞争力;而非功利的价值,则是 完善自我,促进个体的人格和身心健康发展。从实际情况看,我国部分名校比较重视人才培养,因此还受到社会追捧;而有一批不关注人才培养的高校,因身份价值 也已不存在,已经走到破产关门的边缘。大学生身份价值的降低,将迫使所有办学者转变办学理念。不是所有的学生都要争着上大学,大学需要不断提高办学质量来吸引学生。不要感慨大学毕业生的薪酬比农民工高不了多少。成为工人、厨师,还是科学家、教授,本来就是平等的职业选择,没有谁不如谁的问题。相关的主题文章: